Is that "£9,997 value" real, or invented so the price feels like a rescue?
When a sales page lists a tower of bonuses adding up to some huge "total value" and then drops the price to a fraction of it, the big number is not information, it is bait. Its only job is to be the first figure you see, so the real price feels like a rescue. Ask one thing: has any part of that "value" ever been sold, on its own, at that price, to anyone? If not, it is not a value. It is a number someone typed.
The tell. An itemised stack of bonuses with invented prices, summed to a figure no one has ever paid, then slashed.
- The core course£1,997
- "Bonus" mentorship module£2,000
- Private community access£997
- Template "vault"£2,000
- "Fast-start" call£3,003
- Total$0
Why it works. The first number you see sets the anchor, and every figure after it is judged against that anchor whether it deserves to be or not. Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman showed in 1974 that even a number people knew was random, drawn from a spin of a wheel, dragged their later estimates toward it. Later work by Dan Ariely and colleagues found people would anchor a price to digits as meaningless as their own phone number. A fabricated "retail value" works the same way. It sets the reference, and your sense of a fair price quietly moves to meet it.
The check. Take any single item in the stack and look for it sold separately at the claimed price. The "£2,000 mentorship module" that exists nowhere except inside this offer is a number, not a value. A genuine bundle is built from things with real, checkable prices. An invented one is built from things that only exist to be added up.
The limit. Real discounts and real bundles exist, and a lower price for buying several things together is normal commerce. The test is whether the component prices are real and verifiable, not whether a discount is offered. In the United Kingdom, an advertiser making a price comparison is already required to hold evidence for it, and a regulator has been pursuing exactly these inflated "was" and "value" claims through the courts.
What honest looks like. A clear price for a clearly described thing, with any comparison tied to a price that genuinely exists. Then run proof you did not make yourself.
Common questions
- Is a "£9,997 value, yours for £497" offer a real discount?
Only if each item in the stack has genuinely been sold on its own at the price claimed. The big total is there to be the first number you see, so the real price feels like a rescue. A "value" that no one has ever actually paid is a number typed to set an anchor, not a discount.
- How do I check whether the bonuses are worth what they say?
Take any single item in the stack and look for it sold separately at that price. The "£2,000 mentorship module" that exists nowhere except inside the offer is a number, not a value. A genuine bundle is built from things with real, checkable prices.
Sources
- A UK regulator has pursued inflated "was" and "value" reference-price claims through the courts. · CMA, Emma Group consumer protection caseChecked 3 June 2026